Subject: Re: WHISTLEBLOWER-LILLEHAUG2016.PDFDsiHrrasment 2021FOIADEFAULT
Steinhauser Et alFairHousingFS-Brief Per CT Order Ecf 8-3-15 | Disparate Impact | Housing Discrimination (United States)ust with Good Faithy, Good samaritan, with Christian, Conservative Good Faith Intent to continue exposing these Woke Liberalism conducting Government Business at Homesteads Ruling Case Law USSC10-1032 titled Magner vs Gallagher started 2004 terminated by Federal Black Judge Michael Davis 2017.
Blogger: User Profile: Sharon4Andersonr Melvin Carter,his employees DSI Cervantes,employees Ed Smith, Paula Seely,Executive Branch,City Council Amy Bredmoenivorcee aka Mrs. Jeff Neske aka 2nd husband Mike Hahn Dir Parks and Rec. enbank forensic files
Data Practices Center
Sharons-Fraud Updateight,Ponzi Taxing Schemres in her Official and Personal
Beacon - Ramsey County, MN - Property Tax: 262923220023Capacities as City St. Paul,MN Council President
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message
Data Practices Center
Sharons-Fraud Updateight,Ponzi Taxing Schemres in her Official and Personal
Beacon - Ramsey County, MN - Property Tax: 262923220023Cap
Black Bear Crossi
Black Bear Crossings settles with city | Midway Como Frogtown Monitorng vs City St. Paul - Google Searchacities as City St. Paul,MN Council PresidentWHERAS: Amy Bredmoen since 2009 Black Bear Settlement of $800,000 with Boy Friend Mike Hahn Parks and Rec, sub apparant Marriage 2017.
lamplighter lounge st paul - Google SearchRAGEOUS.
Sharon4Andersonahn SHUT OFF SHARONS WATER, STOLE HER CAR AND SMALL TRAILER put on 697 Surrey Tax Statement then 2017,18,19,20 and 2021 Affiant paid in full expecting Rebate or Refunds.
Neighbors want stricter rules after troubles at St. Paul's only ...
St. Paul's only strip club to be investigated, could lose license ...
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reformas VC of DNC WITH Tom Perez with full Knowlegde USS
Judicial Watch Sues HHS Over Failure to Produce Jonathan Gruber Contracting and Consulting Records | Judicial WatchC 10-1032 TITLED Magner vs Gallagher
WRITCOVER.doc
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Ac
FORENSIC
Pictures available on March 23, 2006: Best regards from, Sharon***LETTER TO CITY ATTORNEY 4/17/2006 and 4/18/2006 RE: Appeal 4/18/2006, presumed continued Fax: 4/17/2006 | Fax: 4/18/2006 ***Writ of Prohibition 06/06/2006 |
Sharon at e-democracy: Click here | Sharon's Briefs: Click here CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD SHARON'S CASES Eminent Domain Reform, Passed May 15, 2006 | |||
DOWNLOAD - Technical specs and letter code SP Water 4/18/2006: |
v. Arch
Sharon4Anderson vs City St. Paul - Google SearchO THE ABOVE NAMED Tax Day not dead yet.
Sharon4Anderson vs City St. Paul - Google Search Forensic Files Google
Sharons Default Judgments v. City St. Paul
United States District Court
District of Minnesota
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND
LAW SUPPORTING APPELLANT’S
City of St. Paul, St. Paul Water Board;et al )-Relatees-Respondents
v. NOTICE OF REMOVAL
Mrs. Sharon Anderson; Relator-Removant REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT
AND PETITION FOR IMMEDIATE,
TEMPORARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
BARRING TRIAL VIA
Appellant ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
Tickets,Warrants,Bills of Lading, RICO Pattern609.903, Minnesota Statutes 2006
Administrative Court: no file Jurisdiction/Authority Challenge
St. Paul City Council Ratifications date,time,due process
Federal Court File:___________
--------------http://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/---------------------------------------
MEMORANDUM OF FACT AND LAW
EXTENDED HISTORY OF MOTIVATION FOR HARASSMENT, CHRONOLOGY
LONG TERM HISTORY OF DEFAMATION AND HARASSMENT
The Appellant has been a political candidate in St. Paul and Minnesota for over twenty years. Appellant has also been involved in several instances of litigation which resulted in loss of Appellant’s real property, owned in St. Paul,Aitkin,Itasca and Crow-Wing, Minnesota. This agency is motivated to harass Affiant because Affiant has been critical of St. Paul government and a whistleblower in the past.
HISTORY OF THIS CASE FOR REMOVAL
This action began by the St. Paul water board threatening to disconnect Appellant’s water services, possibly because the exterior meter is apparently not working, and the said agency refuses to replace/repair that meter from the outside.
Appellant has no outstanding water bills and has phoned in a current water meter reading from the inside meter, which works, to the Water Board, and sent has digital photos of the water meter to verify, see:
http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/water.html
http://www.sharonanderson.org/ http://www.sharon4anderson.org/
This action by said agency has to be speculated upon because the agency refuses to give adequate or clear statement of their reasons for the purposes of an appealed scheduled for 4/18/2003, and in doing so denies Appellant the appearance of due process, and is abusing it’s authority to violate Appellant’s privacy rights, wantonly.
ISSUES OF FACT
There is no know fault inside Appellant’s home which would justify that agency’s coming into Appellant’s home, and the agency refuses to give adequate or believable grounds fro such a entry.
The agency’s powers are subordinate to the Minnesota and US constitution and Minnesota law defines; for legal purposes in determinations of fact and law; acceptable interpretations of words in statutes:
Minnesota Statutes, ß645.08, Canons of Construction: In construing the statutes of this state, the following canons of interpretations are to govern, unless their observance would involve a construction inconsistent with the manifest intent of the legislature, or repugnant to the context of the statute:
(1) words and phrases are construed according to ... their common and approved usage; but technical words and phrases and others as have acquired a special meaning; or are defined in this chapter, are construed according to such special meaning or their definition;...
(2) General words are construed to be restricted to their meanings by proceeding particular words;...
Therefore, clearly the basic, long standing cannons of law and state statutory definitions would have to be reviled and violated in order to proceed to trial to invoke the claim that a code violation of some form has been committed. City ordinances would have to stand apart from the rest of the law and a new and foreign standard of law and common understanding of language would have to be created for the criminal charges at issue in the above entitled action to survive and for this case to proceed to trial. There clearly are no genuine issues of fact to be determined, at a hearing, as the agency refuses to state these issues in an appeal su
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
Sharon4CouncilWard2: Sharons Default Judgments v. City St. PaulO THE ABOVE NAMED; sun21feb2021 AFFIANT
House Committee on Oversight and Government ReformRamsey County Fraudulent Equity Taxing Propertys to illegally without Valid Complaints, Equity, Disparagment of Titles now for years
We did not settle Sharon.......we walked away with nothing st all.
Back in 2008 when we won our appeal at the 8th Circuit we were supposed to come back here and get a jury trial. Instead of that the Judge let the other side make a motion for Summary Judgment again which is against the court rules. What they wanted was for the individual inspectors to be out of the lawsuit. Rather than incur legal fees we agreed to it because we thought it would get us to trial faster. Then instead of trial the Judge ordered us to go to mediation and that went no where but it did cost us Attorney fees for a day of time. The the Judge delayed the case until the outcome of "Inclusive Communities was decided. When that got decided (which helped us) the Judge then ordered us to go to mediation with a retired Judge. This time it cost us $500.00 an hour plus our Attorney fees for the day. We didn't settle then either so the Judge just put us on hold again till last month and then he said he was going to let the city have another shot at Summary Judgment again. No matter who won that it would have went back to the 8th circuit for an appeal and if the city lost they then would have went back to the Supreme Court again. We didn't have enough money to finish this thing so we just walked away to be able to keep what money we had left. They would have just kept going with one thing or another with their bought and paid for courts and judges till we were broke and we would be in the same place we are now. They did not want a trial because they knew we would win.
Frnak
http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon
v. Arch
(651) 297-7650
Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless ... - YouTube
SharonsForensicFiles_ - YouTube
here’s more on the Perez confirmation — and the to-and-fro related to the Magner vs. Gallagher landlord dispute — here.
Here’s a tidbit:
At a contentious hearing in May, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., surprised Attorney General Eric Holder with a voice recording that he contended backed up accusations that Perez had strong-armed St. Paul into dropping its lawsuit.
Holder fired back that Issa’s action was “inappropriate and it is too consistent with the way in which you conduct yourself as a member of Congress. It is unacceptable, a
Appointed/Elected:
Appointed on Mar. 26,
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT
FILED WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 20, 2016
NOTICE - MEDIA RELEASE TIME IS 10:00 A.M.
A13-1072 Yvette Ford, Respondent, vs. Minneapolis Public Schools, Appellant.
Court of Appeals.
The statute of limitations for the cause of action created by subdivision 1(1) of the Minnesota Whistleblower Act (MWA), Minn. Stat. § 181.932 (2012), which prohibits employment discrimination based on a good-faith report of a violation of law, is the 6-year limitations period in Minn. Stat. § 541.05, subd. 1(2) (2014), because the cause of action is statutory and has no counterpart at common law.
Affirmed. Justice David L. Lillehaug.
Took no part, Justice Natalie E. Hudson.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgpOd24AjTXKtFbvibs9POITr0O1cktajG5T6QyszYhW-sqV1gXcWt2tXIn5ce9KoH41uloP-WDSwzHq7WCVX8yFFOHGseFvOF4yXwDlE_HWDWfm32dwJcsn2pk04-0ikZCifhGFnmS03I/s1600/Sharon.jpg
sharon4anderson | Sharon4anderson's Weblog
Older Posts - Sharon4anderson's Weblog - WordPress.com
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwtnZaIlfDg#t=26Sharon4Anderson@aol.com AttorneyProSe_Private AG, ECF 65913 Pacer:sa1299 Tel: 651-776-5835 HEALTH CARE CandidateMN Attorney General www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com 2014 2012Senate64 www.sharonsenate64.blogspot.com http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/judicial-corruption-_sharonscarrellaanderson_lawless-america/http://www.pacificlegal.org/document.doc?id=608&utm_source=Sentry+-+3%2F21%2F12+Healthcare&utm_campaign=3-21-12+Healthcare+SENTRY&utm_medium=emailhttp://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/10-1032-bsac-Massachusetts.pdfhttp://sharon-mn-ecf.blogspot.com/2007/03/foia-06cv-permission-to.htmlhttp://mpls.startribune.com/news/metro/elections/profiles/26222.htmlhttp://www.angelfire.com/planet/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file4.pdfhttp://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/PDFedem2006/file6.pdfwww.sharon4anderson.org http://forums.e-democracy.org/groups/stpaul-issues/files/f/900-2007-02-27T034409Z/WritProA06-1150_30Jun06.pdfhttp://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/09/23/google-lawmen-cases-mn-62cv09-1163/POA http://www.angelfire.com/mn3/andersonadvocates/2006water/PDFcorr/SADPA4172006.pdfhttp://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profile/SharonScarrellaAndersonwww.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson