Wednesday, November 14, 2018

SharonsRealestate697Surrey2006vsCitySt.PaulCoRamseyEminentDomain

 Parcel IDOwnerProperty AddressCity
322922410053 SHARON LEE ANDERSON697 SURREY AVEST PAUL

Tax Summary      TO THE PUBLIC AT LARGE, THANKS TO FACEBOOK
FORENSIC FILES POSTED 2009. Scrool to Sharons Appeal http://sharon4anderson.org 
Water Shutoff even tho Bills Paid,Citys Theft of Car,Trailer, 2006,2009, current Ponzi
taxing Scheme of Excessive Consumption via Corrupt DSI Inspector Ed Smith
complicit with City Council to Ratify with 4and 1/2% interest, on tax statement
to Steal Homestead Property on Death of Cpl Jim Anderson,Senior Disabled
Candidate for Various Offices contrary to State and Federal Constitutions.
http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/DOJ-St-Paul.pdf
Bama Boys DFL Nat.Chair Tom Perez and Muslin Keith Ellison complicit with
Mayor Chris Coleman,City Attorney Sara Grewing and David Lillhaug botH
jUDGE AND JUSTICE.
Executive Summary In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez made a secret deal behind closed doors with St. Paul, Minnesota, Mayor Christopher Coleman and St. Paul’s outside counsel, David Lillehaug. Perez agreed to commit the Department of Justice to declining intervention in a False Claims Act qui tam complaint filed by whistleblower Fredrick Newell against the City of St. Paul, as well as a second qui tam complaint pending against the City, in exchange for the City’s commitment to withdraw its appeal in Magner v. Gallagher from the Supreme Court, an appeal involving the validity of disparate impact claims under the Fair Housing Act. Perez sought, facilitated, and consummated this deal because he feared that the Court would find disparate impact unsupported by the text of the Fair Housing Act. Calling disparate impact theory the “lynchpin” of civil rights enforcement, Perez simply could not allow the Court to rule. Perez sought leverage to stop the City from pressing its appeal. His search led him to David Lillehaug and then to Newell’s 
  2018 Payable2017 Payable2016 Payable2015 Payable2014 Payable
 Estimated Market Value$51,000$43,700$44,700$46,900$31,300
 Taxable Market Value$40,800$35,000$35,800$37,500$25,000
       
+Net Tax Amount$536.14$447.46$473.92$499.54$357.34
+Special Assessments$991.86$308.54$298.08$290.46$282.66
=Total Taxes$1,528.00$756.00$772.00$790.00$640.00
+Penalty$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
+Interest$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
+Fees$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00
-Amount Paid$1,528.00$756.00$772.00$790.00$640.00
=Outstanding Balance$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00



Tax Transaction History
Tax
Year		Business
Date		Effective
Date		Transaction TypeTax
Amount		Special
Assessment		PenaltyInterestFeesOverpaymentTotal
20188/28/20188/27/2018Payment($268.07)($495.93)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00($764.00)
20183/28/20183/27/2018Payment($174.73)($323.27)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00($498.00)
20183/20/20183/19/2018Payment($93.34)($172.66)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00($266.00)
20182/28/2018 Original Charge$536.14$991.86$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$1,528.00
20178/28/20178/25/2017Payment($223.73)($154.27)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00($378.00)
20173/28/20173/27/2017Payment($223.73)($154.27)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00($378.00)
20172/19/2017 Original Charge$447.46$308.54$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$756.00
20167/12/20167/11/2016Payment($236.96)($149.04)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00($386.00)
20163/21/20163/18/2016Payment($236.96)($149.04)$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00($386.00)
20162/15/2016 Original Charge$473.92$298.08$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$772.00
 Sales
DateeCRV #Sale PriceState Study RecommendationState Study Reject ReasonCnty Stdy Rec
4/1/1992 $5,000N N
 Pay Property Tax
Pay Property Taxes
 Statements and Notices
 State of Minnesota
The Property Tax Refund Program is administered by the State of Minnesota. For information regarding the program, please call 651-296-3781 or visit the website here 

Form M1PR(Property Tax Refund)
No data available for the following modules: Multi-Parcel Link, Delinquent Taxes, Service Company and Lender.
Information
Ramsey County, Minnesota
90 Plato Blvd West
Saint Paul, MN 55107
ramseycounty.us
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 64097
Saint Paul, MN 55164-0097
Property Values
Email
651-266-2131
Property Tax
Email
651-266-2000
Recorder's Office
Email
651-266-2050
Homesteads
Email
651-266-2040
MapRamsey
Announcements



Sharons Appeal 62cv09-1163

October 26, 2009 at 6:26 PM
SlideShare » My Slideshows 
From: Sharon4Anderson
To: Shewolfeagle
CC: Sharon4Mayor
Sent: 10/26/2009 5:19:55 P.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Appeal 62cv09-1163 www.mncourts.gov

This document must be accompanied by 2 copies of a completed statement of the case. IFP Service by Sheriff Bob.Fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us
HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" \l "a13303 
APPENDIX OF FORMS
FORM 103A. NOTICE OF APPEAL (COURT OF APPEALS)
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF RAMSEY COUNTY COURT
SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CASE TITLE Civil,Criminal,General Eminent Domain
To: All Persons with legal interest in the Parcels of Real Property described in the
Following Delinquent Tax List, Filed with District Court Administrator Lynae.K.E. Olson 651-2202,
published 18Mar09 MapleWood Review www.review-news.com
and all Candidates for Political Offices www.sharon4mayor2010.blogspot.com 
******************************************************************************
STATE OF MINNESOTA,Ward Einess, Revenue, Michael Campion DPS,Cal Ludman HS,All Agencies,County of Ramsey,All Agencies, City of
St.Paul,MN,All Agencies, DSI,HS,HR,
John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in
their Official Capacity‘s, Ind ividually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe
and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg
Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66
Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NWS2d,562
Plaintiffs
V.
Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169
Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTICE OF APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEALS
TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER: 62cv09-1163
DATE OF ORDER: 8Sept.09
OR
http://www.slideshare.net/Sharon4Anderson/62cv091163vandenorthsumjudg8sept09
DATE JUDGMENT ENTERED:10Sept09

TO: Clerk of the Appellate Courts Fred Grittner et al
Minnesota Judicial Center
St. Paul, MN 55155
Please take notice that the above-named defendant's 3rd party plaintiff's appeals to the Court of Appeals of the
State of Minnesota from an order (judgment) of the court filed (10Sept09) on the date shown,
denying defendant's_ QuiTam Relator motion's Jury trial Evidentiary Hearing, Fact Finding,Continuence, Affidavit of Prejudice and for Public Policy pdf Formats found at www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com
NAME,ADDRESS AND NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR PLAINTIFF'S
Ramsey Co. Attorney Susan Gaertner aka Mrs. John Wodele, M.Jean Stepan aka Mrs.John Tancabel 895 Osceola St.Paul, (105120) MN Student John Edison address unk
NAME, ADDRESS, ZIP CODE, TELEPHONE NUMBER, AND ATTORNEY
REGISTRATION LICENSE NUMBER OF ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT:
/s/ VA Widow_Whistleblower QuiTam Relator, Attorney Pro Se,Private AG, InFact, Sharon Anderson aka Peterson-Chergosky-Scarrella Tel: 651-776-5835
Legal Domicile: 1058 Summit/PO Box 4384 and 697 Surrey Ave St.Paul,MN 55104-0384
ECF :P165913_sa1299___sharon4anderson@aol.com _E Democracy Files - Sharon Anderson
SIGNATURE
(The trial court caption is used on the notice of appeal. Subsequent documents shall bear the
appropriate appellate court caption. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" \l "a10301"}, subd. 1 specifies
the contents of the notice of appeal and filings required to perfect an appeal, including filing fees.
{HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" \l "a10303"} sets forth judgments and orders which are appealable
to the Court of Appeals. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" \l "a10401"} specifies time limits for
filing and service of the notice of appeal. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" \l "a107"} provides for
bond or deposit for costs. {HYPERLINK "RCAP.htm" \l "a10801"} provides for a supersedeas
FORM 133. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
(IN COURT OF APPEALS)
CASE TITLE: General,Civil,Criminal Eminent Domain,Taxes,Forfeiture,Constitutionality MS 429.061 Fees/Assess/ROW
STATEMENT OF THE CASE OF
(RESPONDENT)
TRIAL COURT CASE NUMBER:62cv09-1163 (Vandenorth)Reporter(Martinez)
vs.
APPELLATE COURT CASE NUMBER: UNK
Respondent.
1. Court or agency of case origination and name of presiding judge or hearing officer.Answer/Cross/1/2MillionClaim v.CitySt.Paul St.Paul City Council (Lantry) thurs,5Jul2007,Res Assess 07-601pub.hearing 15Aug07,(GS3041156) Notice to Combine Item 51 Res.Ratifying Assessments 07-609 from 12Apr to 27Apr07 (J0707A J0708A: Assm.#8337 697 Surrey ID 32-29-22-41-0053, Referred to Risk Management Ron Guilfoile, See Venue: Ramsey Dist. Crt. 62cv09-1163 Judge Edward Cleary, Recused, Judge Gregg Johnson Recused, Judge John Vandenorth.
2. Jurisdictional statement
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. Whether the Court criminally abused its discretion by Acting a WAR with MN Constitution Art. X to dispose of appellants’ constitutional challenge , Bizzare Method of City St.Paul Fees/Assessments/ROW by Theft,Trespass and Treason.? Usury Interest on Property Tax Statement without WritProA06-1150 30Jun06Formal Complaints,Warrants,Tickets to Defend
2. Auditor Mark Oswald in perjury as www.usbank.com Tax Receipts pdf format.
Mark Oswald Auditor/Elections re: 2008 US Senate
Auditor's False Statements have put at risk 3 thousand Propertys + QuiTam Relator
. Sections 212, 214(b), 214(c), 304, 319, and 403(b) of the Bipartisan Campaign Re-form Act of 2002 (BCRA), Pub. L. No. 107-155, 116 Stat. 81, because those challenges are plainly nonjusticiable or insubstantial under settled law.
bipartisan campaign re-form act 2002 - Google Search
3. Whether, in other respects, the Court should note probable jurisdiction over appellants’ constitutional challenges to BCRA, Relators Medicare, Federal Jurisdiction and set the appeals on those issues for briefing and oral argument.
PROOF OF SERVICE 62cv09-1163
BY PDF FORMAT SHARONSCARRELLA ANDERSON AKA PETERSON
AKA CHERGOSKY_VA Widow_Whistleblower_Candidate State AG,Attorney Pro Se_Private AG

AFFIANT; SET'S FORTH THIS CLAIM OF INJURY CAUSED
BY EMPLOYEES OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ST. PAUL ,COUNTY OF RAMSEY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AND THEIR TRUSTEE'S UNDER THE NAME
OF THE UNITED STATES /GOVERNMENT/CORPORATION 42 USC 3631GROUNDS FOR INJURY VIOLATIONS OF
HONEST SERVICE FRAUD & VIOLATION OF THE US and State of Minnesota's Constitution's & STATUTES of wrong doings, "Bad Behavior" MS609.
609 - CRIMINAL CODE, 2009 Minnesota Statutes
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia,
subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or
other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any
rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws,
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in
equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any
action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken
in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be
granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief
was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress
applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered
to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
1 . Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983, Wood v. Breier, 54 F.R.D. 7, 10-11 (E.D. Wis. 1972).
Frankenhauser v. Rizzo, 59 F.R.D. 339 (E.D. Pa. 1973).
“Each citizen acts as a private attorney
general who ‘takes on the mantel of sovereign’,”

2. Minnesota is a “Right to Work” State! Affiant 1973 Started the Church of Justice Reform, legally incorporated at 1058 Summit Ave. St. Paul, re:Scarrella v. Midwest Fed S&L - Google Search
536F.2d.1207
Its OK to practice God`s law with out a
license, Luke 11:52, Sharon in Good Faith re: God`s Law was here first! “There is a higher loyalty than the Office of Justice of the MN Supreme Court. Sharon Scarrella for Assoc. Justice MN Sup Crt. - Google Searchloyalty to this
country, loyalty to God” U.S. v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 172, 85 S. Ct. 850, 13 L. Ed. 2d 733
(1965)

3. “The practice of law can not be licensed by any state/State. Schware v. Board of Examiners,
United States Reports 353 U.S. pgs. 238, 239. Schware v. Board Examines - Google Search
In Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)
“The practice of law is an occupation of common right.” A bar card is not a license, its a dues card
and/or membership card. A bar association is that what it is, a club, A association is not license,
it has a certificate though the State, the two are not the same..........
RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED BY
Relief can be granted in the following ways in dollar amount Option (A). Approximately
$60,000,000.00 million tax free dollars (Sixty-Six Million Dollars) including Legal Fees, Costs,
Research and Time or tax free;
PLUS THE RIGHTS TO RECOVERY.All 13 Propertys, 91 Chrysler,Trailer,Drivers License, triggering Long Formal Complaints, Warrants, List of Witness, Evidentary , Indictments in the Murder of Cpl.Jim Anderson, 21Sept2000 Sharons 2nd Husband
, Intestate Decedants Tenants in Common , William O and Bernice A. Peterson, Sharons Parents,
Murder of Steven Monroe Quale Sr. and the "takings" of Sharons Daughter Vonessa
Remove the City Attorney John Choi,Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner and Jean Stepan, Student John Edison and State Attorney General Lori Swanson affilliates ,ABA BAR Association and place all lawyer's under the state or federal
licensing program to work in this country under the Constitutional Mandate as it was originally
required. Remove all Lawyers and Attorneys as Staff employment for The State of Minnesota and Congress. Have the State of Minnesota and Congress
restate the state militia under the intent of HR11654 better known as the DICK ACT of 1902

and allow the state militia to enforce and bring claims of injury to the Minnesota State Legislature and floor of Congress to have
these issue address and deal with in 72 hour of such complaint or before a citizen tribunal
hearing board. or Convene Grand Jurys.
Option (B), Bring in the military to help set up a new government to be put in
place and remove all federal and state officials who are guilty of Malfeasance,Nonfeasance,Misfeasance from office and brought them up on military
charges as was done in Germany 1945 for crime against humanity. That how relief can be
granted. The debt cause in this action comes under the 14th amendment section 3 people section
4 tell how to collect this debt..as the "takings" of our Homesteads via City Council's RICO Acts of Theft,Trespass,Treason placed on Property Taxes without Public Improvements to cause Eminent Domain must not stand.
Disclaimer: City of St.Paul cannot and must not tax,Fees/Assessments/ROW based on
Criminal RICO Acts of Theft of Cars,Trailers,Personal Property, Water, Trespass on private Property ie 3 Thousand Cases, Affiant is the only one to Answer, and Treason to Deny Act at War with STate and Federal Laws, Constitutional Guarantees on Candidate Sharon Anderson aka Sharon4Anderson,Scarrella,Peterson-Chergosky_Beckley, Woman,Senior,Disabled, in a Protected Class.
REFERANCE COURT CASES
1. Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 Fed. 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox 456 2nd 233.
Pro se
pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se litigants pleadings are not to
be held to the same high
standards of perfection as lawyers. Platsky v. C.I.A. 953 F.2d. 25.
2. Haines v. Kerner (92 S. Ct. 594). The respondent in this action is a not a Liar or -lawyer and is moving forward inHaines v. Kerner - Google Search
Private Attorney General and Attorney Pro Se, IFP

3. NAACP v. Button (371 U.S. 415); United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs (383 U.S. 715);NAACP v. Button - Google Search
4. Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar (377 U.S. 1);Brotherhood of Trainmen v. Virginia Bar - Google Search
Gideon v.Wainwright 372 U.S. 335;
Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425. Litigants may be
assisted by unlicensed layman during judicial proceedings. Argersinger v. Hamlin - Google Search
someone who is unable to tend to his or her own interest...
9. Warnock v. Pecos County, Tex., 88 F3d 341 (5th Cir. 1996) Eleventh Amendment does not Warnock v. Pecos County Tex - Google Search
protect state officials from claims for prospective relief when it is alleged that state
officials acted in violation of federal law.
government offices, State, local political subdivision, judicial etc comes under Rule 4 j as a
Foreign State.
The question will arise to the issue of 12(b)(6) failure to state a claim to which relief can
be grant. How does put a price on such crimes against humanity. The issue should be
were the 12(b)(6) for the People or 12(b)(1)(2) rule 17 where was the people immunity.
If they were as censured about the people 12 (b) s and immunity and their rights We the
People would not be in this Court now.
"taking" our Homestead in a "Patterened Enterprise for over 20 years
even tho Affiant called and thro another account processed.
Totalling $893.xx Paid May 15,16th 2008.
Affiant charges Mark Oswald as he has been notified by Phone,E-mails and Bank Statements. Oswald has tried to circumvent Affiants online Banking for his pecuniary gain.
Federal Reserve Banks,
mn const. art.x taxes - Google Search
Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks, and applying the
relevant factors, we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal instrumentalities for purpose
of the FTCA, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations.”
Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region.
The stockholding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member board of
directors. The remaining three directors are appointed by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal
Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks, but direct supervision and control of each Bank is
exercised by its board of directors. 12 U.S.C. § 301. The directors enact by-laws regulating the 12 USC 301 - Google Search
manner of conducting general Bank business, 12 U.S.C. § 341, and appoint officers to implement 12 USC 341 - Google Search
and supervise daily Bank activities. These activities include collecting and clearing checks,
making advances to private and commercial entities, holding reserves for member banks,
discounting the notes of member banks, and buying and selling securities on the open market.
See 12 U.S.C. §§ 341 361. 12 USC 341-361 - Google Search
The fact that the Federal Reserve Board regulates the Reserve Banks does not make them federal
agencies under the Act. In United States v. Orleans, 425 U.S. 807, 96 S. Ct. 1971, 48 L. Ed. 2d US v. Orleans - Google Search
390 (1976), the Supreme Court held that a community action agency was not a federal agency or
instrumentality for purposes of the Act, even though the agency was organized under federal
regulations and heavily funded by the federal government. Because the agency's day to day
operation was not supervised by the federal government, but by local officials, the Court refused
to extend federal tort liability for the negligence of the agency's employees. Similarly, the
Federal Reserve Banks, though heavily regulated, are locally controlled by their member banks.
Unlike typical federal agencies, each bank is empowered to hire and fire employees at will. Bank
employees do not participate in the Civil Service Retirement System. They are covered by
worker's compensation insurance, purchased by the Bank, rather than the Federal Employees
room. When the Department Of Justice fails to prevent these actions in the courtroom
and conceal the truth this now show collusion between all three branches of
government. One branch of our government such had integrity to stand up for what is
right. Their failure to do so comes under the term of high crimes and treason, war
crimes, human rights violations, R.I.C.O., and etc. This Appellate Court
of the State of Minnesota www.mncourts.gov is being placed on Notice. Every Federal and State Court
outside of the Ten square miles area and the Federal Court inside of that ten
square miles, area have made it impossible, through its own corruption. For the People and Sharon Scarrella Anderson for over 30 years
lacked enforcement and has been denied the ability to defend herself as those in
Nazis Germany under Hitler. Those who set in the same position in Germany at ,that
time as member of their Government and Military stood before our Military Court and
the World Court and were tried for war crimes and crime against humanity. Years later
they are still being rounded up and charged. There is no statute of limitation on these
types of crimes. This Superior Court of the STate of Minnesota has the choice to find
some type of humanity to give to the People of this nations or pursuing their course of
action, knowing that such action is a crime and some day run the risk of be tried in
another world court.

This Superior Court of the State of Minnesota is fully aware that a corporation
can not bring charges against a living being. The High Court has ruled this in U.S.
Supreme Court PENHALLOW v. DOANE'S ADM'RS, 3 U.S. 54 (1795) and Rule 17,
requires a interest party a living body. Penhallow v. Doanes Admr - Google Search
Case law
Title 28, USC 1601-1611 FSIA
protects the people under the 11th amendment as all
independent entity, not covered under the Act.
Finally, the Banks are empowered to sue and be sued in their own name. 12 U.S.C. § 341. 
Conclusion
The issue being place before this Superior Court of the State of Minnesota is a
history of the abuse being allowed by the Federal and State Courts outside the Ten
square miles and by the Federal Courts inside the State of Minnesota against all
American Nationals. This is in direct violation of our federal constitution and statutes
and title 50 and the 15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 27,
1868 Chap. CCXLIX. ---An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreignTitle 50 - Google Search States and of the above. The American people never rescinded their citizenship to their
country, but by the misuse of legislation, created by the Bar Association, they have
fraudulently expatriated the public officials from our Country the united States of
America and their citizenship to a foreign state standing outside of the constitution and
Suspended the Federal and all State Constitutions without the people knowledge or
consent. By the Courts continuing these actions in the courtrooms they have become a
co-conspirator in acts of mutiny and the overthrow of a constitutional form of
government. Legislators are hiding behind the separation of power clause,
knowing full well of these injuries, being done to the people. When legislation by
Congress could be created to prevent this injury, and their willful failure to do so, make
them as guilty as those Court officials who deny the supreme of the land in their court
bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or
premiums are the same.
Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any Allodial Title - Google Search
liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913) "Hypothecated" all property within theFederal Reserve Act (1913) - Google Search
federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees
(stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a
"beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States
hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th amendment us constitution - Google Search 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System.
In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all
the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States
government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan.
Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of
their "economic slaves", the U.S. citizens as collateral against the un-payable federal debt.
They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth
certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already
been transferred as payment to the international bankers.
The Banks are listed neither as "wholly owned" government corporations under 31 U.S.C. § 31 USC - Google Search
846 nor as "mixed ownership" corporations under 31 U.S.C. § 856, a factor considered in 31 USC 846,856 - Google Search
Wilful failure to address the Affidavit of Prejudice against Ramsey Co. Chief Judge Kathleen Gearin www.sharon4anderson.wordpress.com
Ex. Disclosure Statement
Pearlv. United States, 230 F.2d 243 (10th Cir. 1956),
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the
Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,Public Law 89-719; declared by President
Emergency Banking Ace Mar 9 1933 - Google Search
Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 -
Emergency Banking Act June 5th 1933 - Google Search
Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause dissolved the
Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States
Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States
supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase
in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.
The Federal Reserve System is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty
protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a
"Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S.
Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock
Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (to 1870),
3. 1935 U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 The INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Rule

To
Posted by at