ConstitutionalChallengeNov52019Canvass,Trash,Taxes,DisparitySharonAndersonvsCitySt.Paul,MN

asksheriff@co.ramsey.mn.us, bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us, john.choi@co.ramsey.mn.us, todd.d.axtell@ci.stpaul.mn.us, elections.dept@state.mn.us, elections@pioneerpress.com, elections@co.ramsey.mn.us, chris.samuel@co.ramsey.mn.us
Sent: 11/17/2019 8:27:21 AM Central Standard Time
Subject: Re: St.PaulCouncilAgenda 6Nov and 13Nov2019 ComplaintsBloggedNotice ElectionContestreTrashOrdinancePropertyTaxes,fees,assments

                                    Sun.17Nov2019

        To John Choi Ramsey Co Attorney et al

                                     Affiant in Good Faith, Public Policy must expose the Ponzi Taxing Schemes of City St. Paul and Ramsey County.
Barr defends Trump's use of executive authority, slams impeachment hearings | TheHill

                    http://crimes-against-humanity.blogspot.com

Scrool to Count III    RulingCases

                     http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com

                     Pettiford603 Edmond st.Paul,MN case https://sicko-citystpaul.blogspot.com/

                     Anderson surrey https://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/

Levied and Pending Balance (as of the date above): $1,424.21 over and above of 2019

  taxes paid.on  mk  tvalueof  57thous.

-

Amount Paid

$1,860.00

$1,528.00

$756.00

$772.00

0

                  2020 Tax Change 37.8%

                       

                      To the Above Named; Affiant Candidate Sharon Scarrella Anderson hereby gives LEGAL NOTICE; to Notify City,County,State and Federal Attorneys,

                                                 QUESTIONS COUNT I

                    Constitutionality of MS 205.185 DFL City Council ruling on their own Elections as

           fOX Guarding the Hen House, creating Disparity,Disparagment of Titles.

Canvass Board.

                             Affiant is not challenging the Votes of Council Candidates, but for the Trash Vote is Suspect to Fraud,Misleading Voters OF HIGHER Taxes.

Sec. 205.185 MN Statutes

                          

The governing body of a town conducting the general election in March shall act as the canvassing board, canvass the returns, and declare the results of the election within two days after an election.

                                    

                                                COUNT II ELECTRONIC  Files ConsentAgenda's

                                           Bizzare Tax and Market Values increased in some cases 35% with 4.25 interest, in the Citys wilfule failure to have notarized signatures on Abstracts in all Electronic Communications,  Elections, Realestate Issues, tif financing  Disparity,

Housing and Redevelopment Authority to hold quarterly update on Housing Trust Fund

will discuss implementation strategies for the City’s new $71 million Housing Trust Fund. In December ... into a HousingTrust Fund, for total housing investments of over $71 million. The Housing Trust Fund ... Trust Fund strategy identifies five key objectives to address housing issues: meeting the needs of

Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota

• Authenticate

 

•  PDF

Ch. 3E MN Statutes

3E.01	SHORT TITLE.
3E.02	DEFINITIONS.
3E.03	APPLICABILITY.
3E.04	LEGAL MATERIAL IN OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC RECORD.
3E.05	AUTHENTICATION OF OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC RECORD.
3E.06	EFFECT OF AUTHENTICATION.
3E.07	PRESERVATION AND SECURITY OF LEGAL MATERIAL IN OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC RECORD.
3E.08	PUBLIC ACCESS TO LEGAL MATERIAL IN OFFICIAL ELECTRONIC RECORD.
3E.09	STANDARDS.
3E.10	RELATION TO ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL COMMERCE ACT.

                    Unofficial results of the Nov. 5 general election will be posted to the Minnesota Secretary of State's website.  
Election Results | Ramsey County

One interim Ramsey County elections head appointed for each of retiree Joe Mansky’s big shoes – Twin Cities The county board appointed elections administrator David Triplett to be interim elections manager for the upcoming election year, and elections supervisor Christina Tvedten to be interim assistant elections manager, a new position.

651-266-2171

Contact form

Search | Ramsey County Prope
2020-2021 proposed budget submitted to county board | Ramsey Countyrty Taxes https://www.ramseycounty.us/content/proposed-property-tax-notices-have-been-mailed

       

File #:

RES 19-1972    Version:   1   2

Name:

2019 Election Canvass and Results

Type:

Resolution

Status:

Mayor's Office

In control:

City Council

Final action:

11/13/2019

Title:

Canvassing the returns and declaring the results of the City General Election held November 5, 2019. (To be amended with the results of the reallocation of votes)

Sponsors:

Amy Brendmoen

Attachments:

1. St Paul Abstract, 2. 2019 Ward 1 Reallocation Summary Statement, 3. 2019 Ward 6 Reallocation Summary Statement

• History (1)
• Text
• Public Comments (1)

 Add New Comment

1 record Group Export

Date  Name District Opinion Comment Action 11/11/2019 11:26 AM SharonScarrellaAnderson   Against Constitutional Challenge Election of Chris Tolbert Violation Art.III Separation Powers, Constitutionality Ballot Ordinane18-39 Threat of higher Taxes Vague Arbitrary, many Voters and now Council Members Mitra J Nelson, Nelsie Yang Renters http://taxthemax.blogspot.com Sharons 100 Blogs forensic Files current Constinstitutionaly False Party Designation Sharon is a Donald Trump Supporter Republican http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com

    

City Council

Agenda status:

Final

Meeting date/time:

11/13/2019 3:30 PM

Minutes status:

Draft

Meeting location:

Council Chambers - 3rd Floor

Published agenda:

Agenda

Published minutes:

Not available

Meeting video:

Video

Attachments:

• Meeting Items (113)
• Public Comments (18)

 Add New Comment

18 records Group Export

File # Date  Name District Opinion Comment Action Ord 19-67 11/13/2019 10:49 AM Eric Lein   Against Forcing unwilling customers to pay private trash haulers for unnecessary empty trash carts does NOT align with the rate-setting requirements set forth in MN Stat Chapter 443. Michael Kuchta's method (Steps 1,2,3,4,5,6) will come closer to complying with (1) MN Statute 443.29: "The rates for rubbish disposal shall be a charge against the premises from which rubbish is collected..." AND (2) MN Stat 443.28: "...Such rates shall be as nearly as possible just and reasonable, taking into account the character, kind, and quality of service, of rubbish and method of disposition, the number of people served at each place of collection, and all other factors that enter into cost of service..."  +2 Ord 19-67 11/13/2019 10:27 AM Eric Lein   Against I am AGAINST the price structure proposed in ORD 19-67 as of 11/06/2019. Although not perfect, PLEASE GIVE SERIOUS CONSIDERATION to the ideas submitted on this web page by MICHAEL KUCHTA (Parts 1,2,3,4,5,6). >>> "This proposal relies on the same principle we use in the everyday world when we ask for separate checks at a restaurant: Everyone pays for what they individually consume. With trash, low-use households generate only one-fifth as much as high-use households, so they should pay one-fifth the cost. Simple. Further, the fair share proposal encourages households to reduce waste because it significantly reduces their individual costs when they do. This approach is common sense, fair, easy to understand, and easy to implement." //// "This approach meets the contractual requirement that costs be 'based on ... the actual average tonnages collected per gallon per household in the prior 12 months.'” //// "The rates still generate $24,588,636 in revenue."  +2 RES 19-1917 11/12/2019 4:00 PM SharonScarrellaAnderson   Against CreatingDebt TaxForfeit by Denying Pettifords pay off MS.609.43 at http://taxthemax.blogspot.com RES 19-1972 11/11/2019 11:26 AM SharonScarrellaAnderson   Against Constitutional Challenge Election of Chris Tolbert Violation Art.III Separation Powers, Constitutionality Ballot Ordinane18-39 Threat of higher Taxes Vague Arbitrary, many Voters and now Council Members Mitra J Nelson, Nelsie Yang Renters http://taxthemax.blogspot.com Sharons 100 Blogs forensic Files current Constinstitutionaly False Party Designation Sharon is a Donald Trump Supporter Republican http://sharonsenate64.blogspot.com RES 19-1917 11/10/2019 1:43 PM SharonSenate64   Against Tracking Council on Weekly Basis http://cityattorney-copcorruption.blogspot.com Foia request for the Address of council lawyer Rachael Tierny aka Gunderson Ord 19-67 11/10/2019 1:32 AM Ron Quido     Accept the haulers' offer to continue with the current rates for six months. The haulers' lawyer was obviously signalling that the consortium will legally challenge the City's adoption of this ordinance's proposed rates. Most voters approve of the current system so why drag this issue out now? Ord 19-67 11/9/2019 8:10 AM Sharon4Anderson     To: Young, Susan (CI-StPaul) Cc: dschleck@messerlikramer.com; Tierney, Rachel (CI-StPaul) ; Swanson, Christopher (CI-StPaul) Subject: Confirmation of Phone Call Think Before You Click: This email originated outside our organization. Susan, I wanted to send you an email confirming the information you shared with me this morning as our connection was poor. You mentioned that you gave Jim from the Star Tribune my phone number as it is Public Record and that he will be calling me as I am the Chief Manager of the Consortium. The reason the Star Tribune is calling the Consortium is to inquire and gather information as to the contribution to the YES movement. This inquiry was directed to Messerli/Kramer, Counsel for the Consortium for contributing $1,000.00 and Republic Services, a Consortium Member contributing $28,000.00. You mentioned also that the Star Tribune called Republic Services and R Ord 19-67 11/9/2019 7:52 AM SharonScarrellaAnderson   Against Affiant outrage that apparantly Republic Trash contributed $28,000.00 Lawyer Dan Schxxx $1,000 to the Yes Vote, further Citys Amended Contract without Negotitaions with Haulers,Counsel Lawyer Rachael Tierney sat Silenced, Sharon has Standing Forensic Files also at http://sharonsfreedomlawschool.blogspot.com City is NOT Math Accurate.or Consumer Protections  -1 Ord 19-67 11/6/2019 3:28 PM Michael Kuchta   Against Part 6: This approach meets the contractual requirement that costs be “based on ... the actual average tonnages collected per gallon per household in the prior 12 months.” If you divide those results by the total households in each service level, you get more equitable individual pricing, yet the rates still generate $24,588,636 in revenue. Here’s what every level would pay under this fair share proposal: • 35-gallon cart, every other week: $7.97 per month / $95.65 per year • 35-gallon cart, weekly: $15.94 / $191.31 • 65-gallon cart, weekly: $29.61 / $355.28 • 95-gallon cart, weekly: $43.27 / $519.26 If you compare these costs with current, 2019 rates, every service level gets a price cut except the highest users. The differences: • 35-gallon cart, every other week: Price cut of $147.71 per year / $12.31 per month • 35-gallon cart, weekly: Price cut of $89.97 / $7.50 • 65-gallon cart, weekly: Price cut of $28.96 / $2.41 • 95-gallon cart, weekly: Price increase of $109.46 / $9.12  +2 Ord 19-67 11/6/2019 3:27 PM Michael Kuchta   Against Part 5: Step Four: Because we know how many households are in each service level, and the rates that Ordinance 19-67 sets for each level, we can calculate how much revenue coordinated collection needs to generate from monthly fees. The total: $24,588,636. Step Five: Combining all this information, we now know enough to overhaul rates so each level of service pays its fair share. As we saw in Step Three, the highest-use households -- those with a 95-gallon cart -- generate 42.5% of the total annual trash. So, they should contribute 42.5% of the cost. (Under Ordinance 19-67, high-use households actually would pay only 32.5% of the costs. This locks in the current imbalance that forces low-use households to continue subsidizing high-use households.) To make sure households pay based on their usage, we multiply the revenue the city needs ($24.6 million) by the percentage of trash each level generates.  +2 Ord 19-67 11/6/2019 3:26 PM Michael Kuchta   Against Part 4: Step Two: The city also knows how many households subscribe to which level of service: • 35-gallon cart emptied every other week: 5,074 • 35-gallon cart emptied weekly: 17,606 • 65-gallon cart emptied weekly: 28,912 • 95-gallon cart emptied weekly: 20,150 With this information, we can get a rough idea of how much total trash households generate at each level. For example, at the 95-gallon level, we multiply 20,150 households by an annual capacity of 4,940 gallons (52 weeks, 95 gallons each week). The math shows these households have the capacity to generate 99,541,000 gallons of trash a year. Combined, all 71,742 households generate nearly 234 million gallons of trash a year. Step Three: With those numbers, we can calculate what percentage of trash each level of service has the capacity to generate: • 35-gallon cart, every other week: 2% • 35-gallon cart, weekly: 13.7% • 65-gallon cart, weekly: 41.8% • 95-gallon cart, weekly: 42.5%  +2 Ord 19-67 11/6/2019 3:25 PM Michael Kuchta   Against Part 3: The fair share proposal outlined below makes real change. Based on real-world data (as required by the contract), this proposal cuts rates by 60 percent for the lowest users, while raising rates by about $9 a month for the highest users. This proposal relies on the same principle we use in the everyday world when we ask for separate checks at a restaurant: Everyone pays for what they individually consume. With trash, low-use households generate only one-fifth as much as high-use households, so they should pay one-fifth the cost. Simple. Further, the fair share proposal encourages households to reduce waste because it significantly reduces their individual costs when they do. This approach is common sense, fair, easy to understand, and easy to implement. It’s five easy steps. Step One: Start with the basics. The city has four levels of residential trash service. Based on cart size and how often trash is picked up, we know the volume of trash that each level of service generates  +2 Ord 19-67 11/6/2019 3:24 PM Michael Kuchta   Against Part 2: This presents a great opportunity for the Council to overhaul pricing, to be responsive to city residents, to cut trash fees for more than 70 percent of households, to allow households to pay their fair share based on how much trash they actually generate, and still produce the revenue needed to support coordinated collection. Unfortunately, Ordinance 19-67, as written, does not do that. The current draft is a lost opportunity. It makes only incremental changes, reducing rates across the board by about $1 a month. That approach perpetuates the perverse incentives and inequities that now exist. I do not profess to understand all the intricacies of the 52-page contract. But it seems the language in Section 3.1.5 allows the city much more discretion in how it adjusts rates than the approach being taken in Ordinance 19-67. Even the haulers consortium, in a letter to the city dated Sept. 30, says “pricing under the OTC contract is not strictly formulaic.”  +2 Ord 19-67 11/6/2019 3:24 PM Michael Kuchta   Against Part 1: I will be working the evening of Nov. 6 and unable to attend the public hearing in person to testify on the 2020 trash rates proposed in Ordinance 19-67. But I’d encourage you to modify the ordinance, relying on the approach described below. During the public debate leading to the Nov. 5 referendum, there was one thing people on the “yes” and “no” sides both seemed to agree on: The contract could be better. One of the most common criticisms? Pricing. Current pricing encourages waste instead of encouraging waste reduction. Under current prices, households that generate the least trash subsidize households that generate the most trash. As you know, the contract with haulers does allow price adjustments every year. In fact, some would say the contract mandates adjustments.  +3 Ord 19-67 10/21/2019 11:09 AM SharonAndersonakaScarrella   Against DFL Mob Rule Issue Trash having own Haulers is Similar to Having your own Doctor http://freedom-4you.blogspot.com Major Anti Trust Isues Taxes MN Const.Art.X Levied Equitably Ord 19-67 10/20/2019 3:10 AM CandidateSharonAnderson   Against Just What are you amyB are you amending If it aint broke don't fix or amend.Sec. 220.05. - Base level service and additional service options. What Public Improvements? Ord 19-67 10/17/2019 6:51 PM CandidateSharonAnderson   Against Please read http://sharons-fraudupdate.blogspot.com Forensic Files http://sharon4anderson.org Violation of Charter,Ballot Vote No now Rate Setting Ponzi Taxing Scheme

                                                  COUNT III Disparitys Home town Legal Citizens vs. Illegal Immigrants

                          Blatant Discrimination of any/all Republican Donald Trump Supporters.

  
Search | Saint Paul, Minnesota Trash

17 RES
19-2007
Affirming the City of St. Paul's commitment to our asylum-seeking
residents, and condemning the federal government’s administrative
decision undermining asylum protection for survivors of domestic violence.
Sponsors: Brendmoen

Minnesota Voters Alliance et al. v. Joe Mansky et al. | Brennan Center for Justice

  Sun.17Nov2019

xx

Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella 651-776-5835 sharon4anderson@aol.com

http://blogitbabe.blogspot.com    http://sharon4council.blogspot.com

LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, www.taxthemax.blogspot.com 
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message," 
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based 
actions. Authorized carriers of this message 
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients.  See: Quon 
v. Arch