Wed. 17May2017
To the Above Named, All Government Officials, Media,
Public et al
Affiant VA Widow Whistleblower,
Candidate4Mayor
Gives Legal Notice of Objections to
the City St. Paul,MN
use of Excessive/Abatement Resolutions
without Due Process,
Authority/Jurisdiction to have Drive by
Inspections without Formal Complaints.
Fraudulent Invoices to create Debt
contrary to State and Federal Constitutions Triggering Involuntrary Servitude/
creating Ponzi Taxing Schemes likened to the Petters Ponzi Schemes. see below
THEREFORE until such time that the
Citys use of Excessive Consumption
all Resolutions must be stayed, or special Prosecutor
appointed,
FURTHER STATE AUDITOR MUST AUDIT THE
CITYS BOOKS.
| 1 | 9 | Excessive/Abatement Service Jan 20 to Feb 17, 2017 | Resolution | Approving the City’s cost of providing Excessive use of Inspection/Abatement services billed during January 20 to February 17, 2017, and setting date of Legislative Hearing for June 20, 2017 and City Council public hearing for August 2, 2017 to consider and levy the assessments against individual properties. (File No. J1709E, Assessment No. 178312) | Not available | Not availab |
18 U.S. Code Chapter 77 - PEONAGE, SLAVERY, AND TRAFFICKING ...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-77
U.S. Code › Title
18 › Part I › Chapter 77. 18 U.S.
Code Chapter 77 - PEONAGE, SLAVERY,
AND TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS. Current through Pub. L.
114-38.18 U.S. Code § 1583 - Enticement into slavery | US Law | LII / Legal ...
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1583
18 U.S. Code § 1583 - Enticement into slavery ... (b) Whoever violates this section shall
be fined under thistitle,
imprisoned for any term of years or for
life, ...Involuntary Servitude, Forced Labor, And Sex Trafficking Statutes ...
https://www.justice.gov/.../involuntary-servitude-forced-labor-and-sex-trafficking-stat...
Aug 6, 2015 - Summary: Section 1584 of Title
18 makes it unlawful to hold a
person in a condition ofslavery,
that is, a condition of compulsory service or
labor ...
MEMORANDUMN OF
LAW
Tom Petters Case Summary | USAO-MN | Department of Justice
https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/tom-petters-case-summary
On December 2, 2009,
after a month-long trial and five days of deliberation, a federal jury
convicted Pettersof
orchestrating a $3.65 billion Ponzi
scheme.www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home | www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com www.sharon4anderson.org FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw Sharons
www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com
www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
_
http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See:
Quon
v. Arch.
